Abstract
An analysis was performed on assortment mechanisms and their involvement in the emergence of social differences in stature. This was done by comparing within a number of professional groups the stature of people holding higher posts with the stature of their colleagues in lower positions. It was shown that as a rule people in higher positions were taller than those on lower posts, even after eliminating the influence of social background and formal education. Furthermore, the results of multiple regression analyses demonstrated that when the factors social origin and education were controlled, the variable “professional status” was by far the largest element in explaining the variance in stature. Finally, indications as to possible causal factors on social assortment of stature were provided by the results of an investigation into the stereotypes of tall people and successful people whose polarity profiles revealed a high degree of congruency. The results of these studies are interpreted as an indication that there is a mechanism in our society which permits tall people to rise into higher positions more frequently than smaller people. The theory is put forward that this assortment mechanism is directly connected to stature and is the result of an attributional phenomenon by which tall people are attributed qualities also expected of successful people with a frequency quite out of proportion to probability.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.