Abstract
It is suggested that the chirality number of Hug and Surbeck is unsatisfactory, mainly because it does not accord with the convention for positive circular polarization if the principle of reciprocity is invoked. A reversion to the original definition of the circular intensity difference is proposed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.