Abstract

A central issue in research on multiattribute decision structures is the relationship between attribute weights and variation in brand scores. Conventional wisdom postulates that, as the variation or range of levels on an attribute increases, so will the relative weight the attribute receives in decisions. The results presented in this research do not confirm the conventional wisdom. In particular, subjects were capable of cognitively standardizing scores on each attribute so that judged utilities reflected an attribute's psychological importance, not the statistical variation in its scores. This result and those reported for several other tests appear to be promising for efforts that emphasize structural applications of multiattribute models for marketing communications strategy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.