Abstract
ABSTRACT Multi-satellite altimetry has been employed in tidal modelling as its accuracy has been proven acceptable in constructing good-quality models. However, the modelling process often fails to consider the varying temporal resolution and observation periods among satellites, which can affect the accuracy of the model due to aliasing and Rayleigh effects. In Indonesia, we investigate and propose a satellite selection procedure for tidal modelling utilizing the response method, validated with along-track data obtained from both older and newer generations of ERM (Exact Repeat Mission)-type altimetry satellites, including the TOPEX/Jason series (TOPEX, Jason-1, Jason-2, Jason-3, and SENTINEL-6A), ENVISAT, ERS-2, GFO, SENTINEL-3B, and SENTINEL3A. The most optimal satellite combination identified is the TOPEX/Jason series, GFO, and ENVISAT, as they contribute significantly less error compared to ERS-2, SENTINEL-3A, and SENTINEL-3B, with errors exceeding 50%, primarily due to aliasing and Rayleigh effects. This combination of three satellites with tide gauge stations achieves higher precision (11.31 cm) than the current global tidal model. This study provides empirical evidence that the accuracy of tidal models is not solely dependent on the number of altimetry satellites utilized, but implementing effective satellite selection procedures is also crucial to enhance the precision of a model.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
