Abstract
In ACISP 2006, Paterson and Schuldt proposed a provably secure identity-based signature scheme. Not long after that, the same authors claimed that their proposed scheme above also allows a form of aggregation in which the multiple signatures from the different signers on a single message can be aggregated into a single signature with a more efficient representation than the original set of signatures. The proposed identity-based signature scheme is provably secure in the standard model. In this paper, we show that the Paterson and Schuldt identity-based signature scheme does not support aggregation since the resulting identity-based aggregate signature scheme is vulnerable to both the insider and outsider attacks.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
