Abstract
In 2011, Sun et al. proposed a security architecture to ensure unconditional anonymity for honest users and traceability of misbehaving users for network authorities in wireless mesh networks (WMNs). It strives to resolve the conflicts between the anonymity and traceability objectives. In this paper, we attacked Sun et al. scheme's traceability. Our analysis showed that trusted authority (TA) cannot trace the misbehavior client (CL) even if it double-time deposits the same ticket.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
