Abstract

Understanding the biogeography of past and present fire events is particularly important in tropical forest ecosystems, where fire rarely occurs in the absence of human ignition. Open science databases have facilitated comprehensive and synthetic analyses of past fire activity, but charcoal datasets must be standardized (scaled) because of variations in measurement strategy, sediment type, and catchment size. Here, we: i) assess how commonly used metrics of charcoal scaling perform on datasets from tropical forests; ii) introduce a new method called proportional relative scaling, which down-weights rare and infrequent fire; and iii) compare the approaches using charcoal data from four lakes in the Peruvian Amazon. We found that Z-score transformation and relative scaling (existing methods) distorted the structure of the charcoal peaks within the record, inflating the variation in small-scale peaks and minimizing the effect of large peaks. Proportional relative scaling maintained the structure of the original non-scaled data and contained zero values for the absence of fire. Proportional relative scaling provides an alternative scaling approach when the absence of fire is central to the aims of the research or when charcoal is infrequent and occurs in low abundances.

Highlights

  • Basic categorizations of natural systems as being fire-prone or fire-resistant are reflected in evolved traits (e.g., Uhl & Kauffman 1990)

  • Humans have inhabited and used fire in these closed canopy tropical forests for millennia, which has undoubtedly shaped the biogeography of many species and functional traits in modern systems (Roberts et al 2017, van der Sande et al 2019)

  • Four reconstructions of past fire activity, based on charcoal fragments extracted from lake sediments collected within the state of Madre de Dios in the Peruvian Amazon (Bush et al 2007b, Bush et al 2007a) (Fig. 1), were used as a case study to compare scaling approaches

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Basic categorizations of natural systems as being fire-prone or fire-resistant are reflected in evolved traits (e.g., Uhl & Kauffman 1990). Two scaling metrics commonly used for standardization of charcoal datasets are z-score transformations (Marlon et al 2008, Power et al 2008, Power et al 2010a, Marlon et al 2013, Power et al 2013) and relative scaling (McMichael et al 2012, Valencia et al 2018) Both approaches scale the charcoal data for each lake relative to the values within the lake, overcoming the issue of variations in catchment size or measuring strategies. Our simple scaling method, termed proportional relative scaling, may prove useful when research aims are to compare the absence or near absence of fire across sites or to compare peak magnitudes of fire activity between sites

Methods
Results
Data Accessibility Statement
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call