Abstract
The Parliament acts as the primary subject of constitutionalization of the criminal law, ensuring the adoption of normative acts, which in their content reliably reflect and fully embody the norms and values of the country’s Constitution. This requires parliamentarians to work hard on a preliminary constitutional review of drafted and adopted criminal laws. At the same time, an analysis of the practice of legislative activity shows that such a check is either not carried out, or is carried out purely formally. In this regard, the issue of introducing into parliamentary practice the institution of compulsory legal examination of laws that affect the rights and freedoms of citizens is being actualized. Legal examination of criminal law bills requires that experts have deep and special legal knowledge in the field of constitutional and criminal law, criminology and criminal policy, international and humanitarian law. However, the legal examination of the draft law cannot be perceived as an unequivocal decision on its constitutionality.
Highlights
The Parliament acts as the primary subject of constitutionalization of the criminal law, ensuring the adoption of normative acts, which in their content reliably reflect and fully embody the norms and values of the country’s Constitution
Legal examination of criminal law bills requires that experts have deep and special legal knowledge in the field of constitutional and criminal law, criminology and criminal policy, international and Актуальные проблемы российского права. 2021
В науке уже давно аргументирована необходимость принятия федерального закона (его названия вариативны: «О правовой экспертизе нормативных правовых актов и их проектов в Российской Федерации»13, «Об экспертизе законодательства в Российской Федерации»14, «Об экспертной законопроектной деятельности в Российской Федерации»15, «О правовой экспертизе»16), в котором необходимо закрепить понятие правовой экспертизы нормативных правовых актов и их проектов, принципы ее проведения, виды и объекты экспертизы, ее субъектов, правовой статус экспертов (права, обязанности и ответственность), общие для всех нормативных правовых актов и их проектов правила, основы методики проведения правовой экспертизы, единые критерии оценки акта, требования к экспертному заключению, его юридическую силу, меры по приведению проекта нормативного правового акта, нормативного правового акта в соответствие с действующим законодательством, принимаемые по результатам правовой экспертизы
Summary
The Parliament acts as the primary subject of constitutionalization of the criminal law, ensuring the adoption of normative acts, which in their content reliably reflect and fully embody the norms and values of the country’s Constitution. Однако проведение правовой экспертизы законопроекта нельзя воспринимать как однозначное решение о его конституционности.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
