Abstract

Traditionally the thermal behavior of power devices is characterized by temperature measurements at the junction and at accessible external points. In large modules composed of thin chips and materials of high thermal conductivity the shape and distribution of the heat trajectories are influenced by the external boundary represented by the cooling mount. This causes mediocre repeatability of the characteristic RthJC junction to case thermal resistance even in measurements at the same laboratory and causes very poor reproducibility among sites using dissimilar instrumentation. The Transient Dual Interface Methodology (TDIM) is based on the comparison of measured structure functions. With this method high repeatability can be achieved although introducing severe changes into the measurement environment is the essence of this test scheme. There is a systematic difference between thermal data measured with TDIM method and that measured with temperature probes, but we found that this difference was smaller than the scatter of the latter method. For checking production stability, we propose the use of a structure function-based Rth@Cth thermal metric, which is the thermal resistance value reached at the thermal capacitance belonging to the mass of the package base. This metric condenses the consistency of internal structural elements into a single number.

Highlights

  • The thermal characterization of power devices and assemblies has become more and more important with the growing level of power density

  • For demonstrating the techniques used and the associated problems, we present the temperature changes of specific points in a typical assembly, an IGBT module mounted on a cold plate with various thermal interface material (TIM) layers under the base plate

  • We can observe that the RthJC thermal metrics are not inherent constant values belonging to a thermal capacitance and of precise geometrical dimensions such as silicon, ceramics, and copper packaged device, but are rather a function of external factors like the heat transfer coefficient of the plates

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The thermal characterization of power devices and assemblies has become more and more important with the growing level of power density. Can yield thermal resistances diagrams) sometimes into singlea transient numbers test As it is shown in detail in References [4,5], this way a measurement at a resistance, etc.). Voltageofmeasurements yield at a single point can provide informationFor on example, the temperature structures which are results of to digits, and different instruments provide the same numbers within a fraction of normally not accessible. The reproducibility of thermal parameters measured in different test concepts is examined, and conclusions are drawn

Simple Thermal Metrics
Simulation Experiment on Static and Transient Metrics
10. Difference
Thermal similar
12. Calibration result: forward voltage of a power
13. Measured
Electric Transient
Power Measurement Uncertainty on the Device
Offset and Gain Errors in the Data Acquisition
Reproducibility
Reproducibility Issues of the Test Environment
Static Thermal Tests
Brief Overview of Thermal Measurements Standards
Comparison of the Results Gained from Static and Transient Measurements
Tolerance Expectations in the ECPE Guideline AQG 324
Actual Performance of the TDIM Method as Specified in JEDEC JESD 51-14
Case Study
Discussion
Findings
Temperature monitor points
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call