Abstract

This paper evaluates the plausibility of the recently proposed “Imaginary cardiac vector” hypothesis, viz. that the cardiac vector is an imaginary scalar quantity, and thus not a true vector. The arguments presented in favour of this “Imaginary cardiac vector” hypothesis, do not in fact contradict vector theory, and are thus not crucial arguments. The actual values obtained by Einthoven, are examined vectorially, in order to demonstrate that his original analysis was fundamentally vectorial. Theoretical limitations imposed by the simplistic use of the equivalent dipole concept, are discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call