Abstract

Representing and reasoning with preferences and arguments are two wide and active research topics. In this paper, we establish a link between a preference formalism, called Prioritized Qualitative Choice Logic (PQCL) and argumentation theory. We show that for any set of preferences expressed using PQCL, there is an equivalent Value-based argumentation framework (VAF). We then show that there is a direct relationship between preferred models of a given PQCL theory and the preferred extension of the corresponding VAF. This relationship is interesting since it makes it possible to use an argumentation framework for preferences elicitation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call