Abstract

Wilde’s only novel, The Picture of Dorian Gray, is widely said to have been rejected by W. H. Smith, but there is no doubt that this did not happen. The letter sent to Wilde by the publisher strongly indicates that W. H. Smith contemplated removing the July issue of Lippincott’s Magazine, but does not go so far as to say that the bookstore did. This letter is the only evidence, however, that this is not absolute. The refusal to sell is mere speculation. The fact that none of Wilde’s contemporaries mentioned the incident of The Picture of Dorian Gray that supposedly happened, while the boycott of George Moore’s Esther Waters, which was much less topical than this one, was widely reported and discussed, provides further evidence that Wilde’s work was not rejected. Given that the censorship of literary works by private enterprises was still topical in the 1890s, it is unbelievable that the rejection of Wilde’s novel would not have been covered by any newspaper. It makes no sense, except to think that such a thing did not exist at all. It is also clear that this was not the case in the 1895 Wilde trial. Wilde’s lawyer argued that the piece was not a social evil because it was sold uninterruptedly, and the other side, which would have liked to take advantage of it in any way, never once touched on the boycott. Therefore, it would be safe to say that W. H. Smith’s refusal to sell did not happen at all.

Highlights

  • Oscar Wilde is seen in gay culture as a martyr who was shut out of a society where homophobia was rampant

  • Temples were built in London and New York City, with Wilde as a symbol of LGBT rights

  • This novel first appeared in Lippincott’s Magazine before it was published as a book in 1891

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Oscar Wilde is seen in gay culture as a martyr who was shut out of a society where homophobia was rampant. This novel first appeared in Lippincott’s Magazine before it was published as a book in 1891. The British Library’s web catalogue tells us the same thing as background information on the work: “Britain’s largest bookseller, W H Smith & Son, refused to stock the July edition of the magazine After Wilde’s conviction, Locke withdrew the work from publication, and circulation of the work almost ceased There is another account of this, according to Simon Stern, who quotes the bookstore’s testimony, as follows: “Edward Baker, a second-hand book dealer in Birmingham, claimed that after Wilde’s trial, Dorian Gray “was suppressed by the publishers, who declined to sell another copy, they were inundated with orders.” (Stern 2017). I would like to discuss how the media at the time reported the incident

Media Reaction at the Time
Media Reaction to the Boycott of another Novel at the Time
Wilde Trials
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.