Abstract

The present study investigated the use of refusal by Persian and Kurdish speakers (PSs and KSs) as well as the frequency and shift of semantic formulas with regard to types of eliciting acts and status of the interlocutor. A group of 278 participants, including 136 PSs and 142 KSs, with the age range of 18–28 were asked to fill out a written Discourse Completion Test (DCT). The gathered data were coded and analyzed according to the taxonomy of refusals developed by Beebe, Takahashi, and Uliss-Weltz (1990). The results revealed that ‘direct refusal’, ‘regret’, ‘excuse and reason’, ‘wish’, and ‘postponement’ were the most frequently used strategies. Moreover, differences were observed in the frequency and shift of semantic formulas used by PSs and KSs. For instance, KSs displayed a higher level of frequency shift in their use of several semantic formulas regarding status level. They were also found to use a greater variety of strategies. Additionally, ‘Swearing’ was found to be a new category of semantic formulas which is not included in the classification of refusal strategies adopted as theoretical framework. As a culture specific strategy, ‘Swearing’ functioned as a type of face work technique used to soften the face threat existing in the speech act of refusal. The findings of the study can help reduce misunderstandings and breakdowns in communication that may take place in the conversations between Persian and Kurdish interlocutors. They can also contribute to our understanding of refusal as a universal speech act and to the general concern to reduce miscommunication.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call