Abstract
The study on anti-corruption expertise as a measure of corruption prevention touches on only certain aspects of this topic. In the section of the article devoted to the essence of the effectiveness of anti-corruption expertise, it is noted that the purpose of using anti-corruption expertise is to exclude from the legal space legal norms that create opportunities for corruption, but there is no audit of the effectiveness of the application of this particular norm of corruption prevention. In the second part of the article, trends are analyzed that contribute to an increase in the effectiveness of anti-corruption expertise, and here the author relies on the advantages of public anti-corruption control. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the fact that it substantiates the need for an audit of the effectiveness of anti-corruption expertise - calculating the predicted result of reducing manifestations of corruption, which will indicate the real action of the institution of anti-corruption expertise. It also points to the need to increase the level of legal awareness of citizens by involving a wide range of people in conducting anti-corruption expertise. The scientific result of the study was the proposal for the need to change the requirements for persons wishing to obtain state accreditation as an independent expert for conducting anti-corruption expertise.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
