Abstract

The paper is devoted to the analysis of the issue of arbitrability of disputes involving consumers, which does not find an unambiguous solution either in law or in judicial practice. The author examines the positions of the highest judicial instances, as well as courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts on this issue, which are contradictory in nature. Having conducted a systematic analysis of legislation, legal science and judicial practice, given the special legal situation of the consumer, the author concludes that it is possible to have an arbitration agreement between the consumer and a person engaged in entrepreneurial activity, subject to certain conditions, in particular, the presence of the free will of the consumer to consider the dispute in the arbitration court and the absence of infringement of his rights in arbitration proceedings in comparison with the consideration of the dispute in the state court. The question is raised about the need for the administration of this category of disputes by permanent arbitration institutions. According to the results of the scientific research, changes in the norms of the legislation of the Russian Federation regulating the relations under consideration are proposed. Thus, it is proposed to word paragraph 1 of Article 17 of the Law of the Russian Federation “On Consumer Rights Protection” as follows: “Consumer rights protection is carried out by a court or an arbitration court”. It is also proposed to supplement Article 17 of this Law with paragraph 4: “Disputes involving consumers can be submitted to an arbitration court if all guarantees provided by law for the arbitration party are met for the consumer, provided that the following conditions are met: 1) the dispute must be considered during the administration of a permanent arbitration institution; 2) the consumer must be exempt from paying the costs associated with resolving the dispute in arbitration; 3) the place of arbitration must be determined within the subject of the Russian Federation in which the consumer resides.”

Highlights

  • В правоприменительной практике является актуальным вопрос о правомерности заключения соглашения о рассмотрении спора в третейском суде между потребителями, с одной стороны, и лицами, профессионально осуществляющими предпринимательскую деятельность, с другой стороны

  • The paper is devoted to the analysis of the issue of arbitrability of disputes involving consumers, which does not find an unambiguous solution either in law or in judicial practice

  • The author examines the positions of the highest judicial instances, as well as courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts on this issue, which are contradictory in nature

Read more

Summary

Introduction

В правоприменительной практике является актуальным вопрос о правомерности заключения соглашения о рассмотрении спора в третейском суде между потребителями, с одной стороны, и лицами, профессионально осуществляющими предпринимательскую деятельность, с другой стороны. 17 этого Закона пунктом 4: «Споры с участием потребителей могут быть переданы на рассмотрение третейского суда при соблюдении для потребителя всех гарантий, предусмотренных законом для стороны арбитража, при наличии совокупности следующих условий: 1) спор должен быть рассмотрен при администрировании постоянно действующего арбитражного учреждения; 2) потребитель должен быть освобожден от уплаты расходов, связанных с разрешением спора в арбитраже; 3) место арбитража должно быть определено в пределах субъекта Российской Федерации, в котором проживает потребитель».

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.