Abstract

Since the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) of a typical BWR features a lower head that is penetrated by a forest of control rod guide tubes (CRGTs), coolability of the debris bed formed in the lower head during a severe accident can be realized by coolant injection through the CRGTs (so-called “CRGT cooling”). This paper is concerned with performance assessment of such CRGT cooling system, whose heat removal capacity is determined by two mechanisms: (i) heat-up and boiling of coolant inside the CRGTs; and (ii) evaporation of coolant which reached the top of the debris bed from CRGTs (top flooding). For this purpose, analyses were accomplished by coupling the COCOMO and RELAP5 codes, which simulate the quenching process of the debris bed and the coolant flow inside the CRGTs, respectively. An analysis was first carried out for a unit cell with a single CRGT, whose decay heat removal was limited by heat conduction from debris to the CRGT wall. The simulation indicated that without top flooding, though the temperature of the unit cell was eventually stabilized by the cooling of the CRGT wall, remelting of metallic debris (Zr) in the peripheral region was unavoidable due to low conductivity of corium. Boiling in the CRGT was not only beneficial to heat transfer, but also contributing to a flat axial temperature profile. Given the nominal flowrate of the CRGT cooling, the coolant was not completely boiled off in the CRGT, and therefore the remaining liquid water at the outlet of the CRGT was available for top flooding of the debris bed. The subsequent simulation including the top flooding showed that the debris bed was rapidly quenched without any remelting. However, the top flooding may have a side effect which was Zr oxidation risk at high temperature, leading to production of reaction heat and H2. Finally analyses were performed for prototypical cases for a reference Nordic BWR, and the results implied that the CRGT cooling could be used as a promising strategy for severe accident mitigation. It is critical that the debris bed is sufficiently cooled down during its formation so that the oxidation risk is eliminated when the CRGT cooling is applied.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.