Abstract

Portugal is often portrayed as a relatively successful case in the control of COVID-19's March 2020 outbreak in Europe due to timely confinement measures, commonly referred to as the “lockdown”. As in other European Union member states, by late April, Portugal was preparing the phased loosening of such measures scheduled for the beginning of May. Despite a modest reduction in infection rates by that time, there was insufficient data to reliably forecast imminent scenarios. Using the South Korea data as scaffold, which became a paradigmatic case of recovery following a high number of infected people, we fitted the Portuguese data to biphasic models using non-linear regression and compared the two countries. The models, which yielded a good fit, showed that recovery would be slow, with over 50% active cases months after the lockdown. These findings acted at the time as a warning, showing that a high number of infected individuals, together with an unknown number of asymptomatic carriers, could increase the risk of a slow recovery, if not of new outbreaks. A month later, the models showed more favorable outcomes. However, shortly after, as the effects of leaving the lockdown became evident, the number of infections began rising again, leaving Portugal in a situation of inward and outward travel restrictions and baffling even the most conservative forecasts for the clearing of the pandemic.

Highlights

  • The first documented case of COVID-19 infection in Portugal dates back to March 2, 2020

  • It was consensual that the spreading of COVID-19 in Portugal, with respect to the number of infected people, fatalities, and intensive care unit (ICU) internments, was reaching a plateau when

  • It must be emphasized that, on April 19, Portugal had yet to reach the peak of active cases, which means that data could not be fitted to the descending phase of the curve, potentially biasing the model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The first documented case of COVID-19 infection in Portugal dates back to March 2, 2020. Motivated by the rapid progression in other countries, especially in neighboring Spain [see [1, 2]], the country moved swiftly to control dissemination by shutting down many public services and imposing strict confinement measures [see, for instance, [3]]. The available data were markedly insufficient to draw solid forecasts even on a short term At this stage, epidemiological SIR (“susceptible,” “infected,” and “recovered”) models were difficult to produce in Portugal and elsewhere

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.