Abstract

The counting class C=P, which captures the notion of “exact counting”, while extremely powerful under various nondeterministic reductions, is quite weak under polynomial-time deterministic reductions. We discuss the analogies between NP and co-C=P, which allow us to derive many interesting results for such deterministic reductions to co-C=P. We exploit these results to obtain some interesting oracle separations. Most importantly, we show that there exists an oracleA such that $$ \oplus P^A \nsubseteq P^{C_ = P^A } $$ and $$BPP^A \nsubseteq P^{C_ = P^A } $$ Therefore, techniques that would prove that C=P and PP are polynomial-time Turing equivalent, or that C=P is polynomial-time Turing hard for the polynomial-time hierarchy, would not relativize.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.