Abstract
Optimal error bounds for adaptive and nonadaptive numerical methods are compared. Since the class of adaptive methods is much larger, a well-chosen adaptive method might seem to be better than any nonadaptive method. Nevertheless there are several results saying that under natural assumptions adaptive methods are not better than nonadaptive ones. There are also other results, however, saying that adaptive methods can be significantly better than nonadaptive ones as well as bounds on how much better they can be. It turns out that the answer to the “adaption problem” depends very much on what is known a priori about the problem in question; even a seemingly small change of the assumptions can lead to a different answer.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
