On the Potential Role of Viscoelasticity in Fluid‐Induced Seismicity

Abstract

AbstractFluid‐induced earthquakes adversely affect industrial operations like hydraulic fracturing (e.g., 4.6 Mw in Alberta, Canada) and enhanced geothermal systems (e.g., 5.5 Mw in Pohang, South Korea). Identifying all underlying physical processes contributing to fluid‐induced seismicity presents an open challenge. Recent work reports signatures of event‐event triggering or aftershocks—common for tectonic settings—within the context of fluid‐induced seismicity. Here, we investigate the underlying potential cause of these field observations from a modeling perspective. We extend a novel conceptual model to simulate the characteristics of crustal rheology and stress interactions in a porous medium by combining viscoelastic effects with fluid diffusion and invasion percolation associated with a point source. Our model successfully reproduces realistic aftershock behavior and statistical properties similar to those resulting from tectonic loading indicating that the statistical properties of aftershocks are unaffected by the fluid injection rate. At the same time, the Gutenberg‐Richter relation, the spatial footprint of fluid‐induced events and their dependence on the permeability field are largely unaltered by the viscoelasticity of the medium and the aftershocks it causes. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of varying fluid injection rates on detecting aftershocks and event‐event triggering sequences during viscoelastic stress redistribution. We find that when the injection rate is sufficiently high, aftershock detection and recovery of their statistical properties are only feasible when the underlying internal stress redistribution is directly accessible. This could explain why aftershocks have not been reported in some field studies of fluid‐induced seismicity.