On the possibility of using damaged plasticity models in the assessment of structural response of gravity beams

Abstract

Advent of concrete damaged plasticity material models has drastically improved the accuracy in predicting the structural response of concrete structural elements using finite element Analysis. However, exploration of the accuracy of this method in analysing complex concrete forms is scanty. Gravity Beams, a term coined in this investigation, are those beams in which gravity is used to design the topology of beam form conjointly with the novel manufacturing strategy ‘Fabric Formwork’. In this investigation these beam forms were numerically analysed using prevalent material and damage models. Numerical structural response was evaluated using these models and compared to experimental response. It was deduced from the comparative evaluation that numerical models closely predict the structural response of gravity beams. Moreover, dissimilarity analysis revealed that the diversion of the results was due the shape error between Modelled gravity beams, which were used for numerical analysis, and actual 3D scanned beams. It was deduced after analysis of experimental and numerical failure patterns that local imperfections also play a major role in the deviation in the numerical model. Furthermore, cross-sectional proportion ratio (CPR) was also introduced to give a numerical identity to gravity beams. This ratio was used to frame a parametric comparison of gravity beams and the corresponding structural response, to explore the parametric dependency.