Abstract
The possibility of expanding the number of features that are evaluated by an expert when deciding on the suitability of a copy of the handwritten requisite for the production of handwriting examination is considered. The examples of the benefits of such an extension from the point of view of expert practice are given as well as the examples illustrating significant differences in the quality of copies of handwritten details obtained in various ways and under different conditions (modified document surface geometry, lighting, file resolution, type of printing device, image fixing method, etc.). There are examples of the benefits of such an extension from the point of view of the trial given. A list of criteria is proposed, the characteristics of which should not only be assessed, but also described by an expert in the text of an expert report. The examples of some inaccuracies and logical contradictions in some expert conclusions drawn from copies of handwritten requisites are provided.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
