Abstract
Abstract The performance of the heterogenous ideal absorbed solution theory (HIAST) using a uniform energy distribution and the global ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) is studied on their predictability f multicomponent adsorption equilibria along with experimental data of gases on two activated carbons. Results show that HIAST may not always provide better predictability than IAST if the energy distribution parameters are not properly chosen, although it is reported in the literature that in most cases HIAST is superior to IAST.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
