Abstract
The mean separations for tin, aluminium and silver rough surfaces pressed beneath a horizontal flat silver-steel anvil by high loads, disagreed with predictions from Tsukizoe and Hisakado theory, which incorrectly assumes that the real contact area equals the applied pressure P divided by the micro-hardness M of the softer contacting material. The point of initial contact (or zero penetration) corresponded to the truncation of surface heights at t = 3.5, for surfaces having Gaussian distributions, where t is the statistical probability function.At high loads, the real contact area as calculated from experimental separation data, corroborated values obtained from profilometry but disagreed with predictions from classical plastic deformation theory. The real area of contact equalled K (PM)m, where K and m are constants which take different values for each of three load ranges.For plastic deformations, the assumption that the relation between the contact area and the separation can be obtained directly from the bearing area curve can be in error by up to 20% at high loads fi.e. for PM >5 × 10−2.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.