Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract
Due to its systemic approach, structural realism (or neorealism) can be subsumed under methodological holism, which takes social phenomena to be wholes that cannot be reduced to their parts. The wholes posited by structural realism are the state and the international structure. Recent developments in the philosophy of social science suggest that methodological holism ought to be limited to causal explanation and complemented by ontological individualism, which requires an account of how social wholes derive from individuals. Structural realism lacks such an account because it takes the state as an empirical given, mistaking for a fact what is really a concept in need of deductive derivation from individuals. To bring the theory methodologically up to date, this essay undertakes such a derivation of the state from individuals, proceeding in the deductive manner of political theory. It thus provides structural realism with a methodologically valid ontology, which, in turn, enables the theory to better defend itself against liberal and constructivist critics who reduce the state to a transient phenomenon.
Highlights
Due to its systemic approach, structural realism can be subsumed under methodological holism, which takes social phenomena to be wholes that cannot be reduced to their parts
Recent developments in the philosophy of social science suggest that methodological holism ought to be limited to causal explanation and complemented by ontological individualism, which requires an account of how social wholes derive from individuals
Kenneth Waltz’s structural realism famously takes a systemic approach in order to explain the behavior of states by the constraining effect of the international structure
Summary
Kenneth Waltz’s structural realism (or neorealism) famously takes a systemic approach in order to explain the behavior of states by the constraining effect of the international structure Since both the structure and the state are social wholes, that is, collectivities with emergent properties and causal effects of their own, and since Waltz assumes the state to be an empirical entity, he can be said to embrace methodological holism—an approach in the philosophy of social science that gives explanatory and ontological priority to higher-level social entities and their properties. Applied to Waltz’s theory, this argument means that its explanatory account of how the social whole of the international structure causally affects the behaviors of the social wholes of the states needs to be complemented with an ontological account of how the international structure and the state depend on the existence of individuals. We need to undergird Waltz’s systemic explanation of the behavior of states with an ontological generation of the state from individuals
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
