Abstract
A key challenge in the study of early language ontogeny is to discover when and how human language acquisition begins. Here, I attempt to move beyond dichotomous nature-nurture explanations of this process in my pursuit of the mechanisms underlying early language ontogeny. I do this by examining early language acquisition from a different perspective: I compare and contrast spoken and signed language acquisition. Then, based on the four sets of findings summarized below, I formulate a testable theory about the mechanisms that underlie early language acquisition, as well as the specific features of the environmental input, that together make possible human language acquisition. I further propose a new way to construe language ontogeny. Specifically, I advance the hypothesis that speech, per se, is not critical to language acquisition. Instead, I propose that the specific distributional patterns, or structures, encoded in the input — not the specific modality — are the critical input features necessary to enable very early acquisition to begin and to be maintained in our species from birth. A discussion relating the present findings to hypotheses about language phylogeny is also provided.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.