Abstract

Additive Manufacture (AM) of Ti–6Al–4V frequently leads to undesirable, coarse, columnar β-grain structures with a strong <100> fibre texture. In Wire-Arc AM (WAAM), it has been found that the application of a low plastic strain, by methods such as inter-pass rolling, can disrupt β columnar growth and produce a refined, equiaxed grain structure that is more randomly orientated. The origin of this desirable effect has been investigated by thermo-mechanical simulation, direct in-situ EBSD observation, as well as by real-time synchrotron X-ray diffraction (SXRD) during rapid heating. These complementary approaches have shown that, when starting with a WAAM microstructure, the grain refinement process produces a unique micro-texture represented by a four-pole motif symmetrically centred on the parent grain {100} orientations. These new β-grain orientations can be reproduced by a double {112}<111> twinning operation, which produces 12 new, unique, β-orientation variants. High-resolution orientation-mapping techniques and in-situ SXRD heating simulations suggest that the prior β does not twin during deformation, but rather the grain refinement and related texture may be caused by annealing twinning during β re-growth on rapid re-heating of the deformed AM microstructure. Although this is the first time such a unique texture has been observed in a deformed and β annealed Ti–6Al–4V material, it was only found to dominate under the unusual conditions that occur in AM of rapid heating – a fine, lightly deformed α transformation microstructure, with a very coarse starting β-grain structure.

Highlights

  • Additive manufacturing (AM) processes are based on the principle of exporting a digital model from a CAD file to build components by adding material layer upon layer (Dutta & Froes 2017; Uriondo et al 2015)

  • Those results obtained from the interviews were cross-referenced against Table 2 and the secondary data obtained from OEMs to create a comparison framework for the selection of AM technologies according to company’s business drivers

  • Among the four AM processes selected for this study, there is not a unique AM technology that suits every metal aerospace application

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Additive manufacturing (AM) processes are based on the principle of exporting a digital model from a CAD file to build components by adding material layer upon layer (Dutta & Froes 2017; Uriondo et al 2015). Amongst the different AM technologies on the market, only a few offer the potential to produce fully dense metal components (Murr et al 2013; Uriondo et al 2015; Sun et al 2013) with similar mechanical properties as traditional methods; being suitable for aerospace applications (Joshi & Sheikh 2015; Uriondo et al 2015).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.