On the notional impact of background noise on the human response to UAVs

Abstract

Proponents of UAV-based industries would like to think that their aircraft will be incapable of causing annoyance (among other negative responses) in the communities that they serve due to the noise of their vehicles simply not being heard over the existing soundscape. No measures of noise that are in wide use today for aviation take background sound into consideration and, thus, would not predict this outcome. This work is an attempt to bridge this gap by looking at past results from psychoacoustic research in which background sounds appear to play a significant role (not just for aviation sources). It includes information on the problem of human auditory detection in general—what is the transductive mechanism of the ear, how does one quantify detectability, etc., and it attempts to make the connection between detectability and annoyance. A notional schematic version of how measures/predictions of these two aspects may be incorporated into a single assessment of noise is given. Overall, detectability is shown to be very complex to predict relative to conventional noise metrics that are used to correlate with human response. Given this, the outlook for the use of measures of detectability in scientific, industrial, and regulatory applications is discussed.