Abstract
We show that the notion of uncontrollable marking commonly used in the literature on supervisory control theory of Petri nets is not sound, by means of a counter-example. We also show how the definition can be corrected and provide an adaptation of a decidability proof for the problem of checking controllability for specifications expressed as deterministic Petri net languages.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
