Abstract
Physicians are expected to practice scientifically sound medicine, to be critical of industry claims, and to be immune from making clinical decisions biased by commercial sponsorship and marketing. The reality, as argued in this article, is that much of medical research, in its conduct and reporting, is distorted by commercial interests and that physician decision-making remains vulnerable to the effects of subliminal commercial promotion which has the potential to create conflicts of interest, or perceptions thereof, and undermine public trust. Research is presented that may encourage physicians to view recently revised Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) guidelines on the ethical relationships between the medical profession and industry as an attempt to deal with such conflicts in protecting our authority and standing within the community.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
