Abstract

The majority of FEA simulation software offers a library of material properties. However, the included materials are generic or the most common and do not represent the entire materials market. The problem is fairly solved by the material suppliers that usually provide the material properties of their products or by data available in materials databases. However, the information provided by the materials databases does not include experimental data nor provide information on the testing procedures. Due to this absence, users can not verify the information or its accuracy on the material database. Moreover, data related to material constitutive models, required for accurate simulations seems to be absent. This study focuses on the materials databases available as open-source or paid services, demonstrating that existing macroscopic materials databases do not have information on the experiments conducted nor have constitutive behavior characterization models.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.