Abstract

The third-party court case quality and effectiveness evaluation has theoretical rationality different from the court 's internal self-quality and effectiveness evaluation in the court case quality and effectiveness evaluation, and has unique subject value attributes; however, the current internal self-evaluation system of the court has limitations in terms of evaluation elements such as subject, content, method, purpose and effectiveness, and cannot fully realize the functional requirements of the quality and effectiveness evaluation of court cases. The implementation of the third-party court case quality and effectiveness evaluation is not only in line with the value of judicial operation, but also has the value of the rule of law practice different from the self-quality and effectiveness evaluation within the court. Therefore, the implementation of the third-party court case quality and effectiveness evaluation has the necessity of theory and practice, and is an important part of the court case quality and effectiveness evaluation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call