Abstract
The reality of the Tulving-Wiseman function (Tulving & Wiseman, 1975) that describes the outcomes of a large number of recognition-failure experiments has been called into question by Hintzman (1992), who has argued on formal grounds that the function emerges because of mathematical constraints on the maximum possible values of recognition conditionalized on recall. In this article Hintzman's claim is shown to be contrary to empirical facts
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
