Abstract
Recent studies of quasi-stellar objects (QSOs) with ROSAT suggest the existence of a significant population of soft X-ray weak QSOs (SXW QSOs) where the soft X-ray flux is ~10-30 times smaller than in typical QSOs. Why are these QSOs soft X-ray weak, and what is their relationship to broad absorption line QSOs (BAL QSOs) and X-ray warm absorber QSOs? As a first step in a systematic study of these objects, we establish a well-defined sample of SXW QSOs that includes all αox ≤ -2 QSOs from the Boroson & Green sample of 87 Bright Quasar Survey QSOs. SXW QSOs comprise ≈11% of this optically selected QSO sample, and we find soft X-ray weakness in both radio-quiet and radio-loud QSOs. From an analysis of C IV absorption in the 55 Boroson & Green QSOs with available C IV data, we find a remarkably strong correlation between αox and the C IV absorption equivalent width. This correlation suggests that absorption is the primary cause of soft X-ray weakness in QSOs, and it reveals a continuum of absorption properties connecting unabsorbed QSOs, X-ray warm absorber QSOs, SXW QSOs, and BAL QSOs. Many of our SXW QSOs have ultraviolet absorption that is intermediate in strength between that of X-ray warm absorber QSOs and that of BAL QSOs, and their X-ray absorption is also likely to be of intermediate strength. From a practical point of view, our correlation demonstrates that selection by soft X-ray weakness is an effective (≳80% successful) and observationally inexpensive way to find low-redshift QSOs with strong and interesting ultraviolet absorption.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have