Abstract

This paper investigates the nature of written musical scores and their role in the communication between composer and performer. Using as thread the narrative of the rewriting of a problematic earlier score, the investigation starts from Derrida's emphasis of absence in the phenomenon of writing (1982) and Eco's concept of model reader (1979), and stresses the importance of improvisation in the creative process and its impact in the act of writing, introducing a notion of hermeneutics from Barthes' distinction between Work and Text (1977), Bloom's concept of poetic misprision (1975), and Austin's theory of speech-acts (1962), which is used to create an interpretative tripartite model. There is then a discussion on the purely abstract nature of a composition and the pitfalls involved in the task of transcribing performances. During the course of the discussion, the rationale investigated engenders twelve directives for the effective preparation of musical scores.

Highlights

  • Abstract: this paper investigates the nature of written musical scores and their role in the communication between composer and performer

  • There is the matter of gaining an understanding of what a musical score exactly represents, of what role it plays in the communicative process between a composer and a performer

  • I intend to be dealing with the last two problems: I will try to shed some light into the meaning that musical scores have for the musicians who read and interpret them1, and I will try to derive from this rationale some directives on how a composer can best prepare a musical score for a new composition

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Abstract: this paper investigates the nature of written musical scores and their role in the communication between composer and performer.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call