On the molecular electronic flux: Role of nonadiabaticity and violation of conservation

Abstract

Analysis of electron flux within and in between molecules is crucial in the study of real-time dynamics of molecular electron wavepacket evolution such as those in attosecond laser chemistry and ultrafast chemical reaction dynamics. We here address two mutually correlated issues on the conservation law of molecular electronic flux, which serves as a key consistency condition for electron dynamics. The first one is about a close relation between "weak" nonadiabaticity and the electron dynamics in low-energy chemical reactions. We show that the electronic flux in adiabatic reactions can be consistently reproduced by taking account of nonadiabaticity. Such nonadiabaticity is usually weak in the sense that it does not have a major effect on nuclear dynamics, whereas it plays an important role in electronic dynamics. Our discussion is based on a nonadiabatic extension of the electronic wavefunction similar in idea to the complete adiabatic formalism developed by Nafie [J. Chem. Phys. 79, 4950 (1983)], which has also recently been reformulated by Patchkovskii [J. Chem. Phys. 137, 084109 (2012)]. We give straightforward proof of the theoretical assertion presented by Nafie using a time-dependent mixed quantum-classical framework and a standard perturbation expansion. Explicitly taking account of the flux conservation, we show that the nonadiabatically induced flux realizes the adiabatic time evolution of the electronic density. In other words, the divergence of the nonadiabatic flux equals the time derivative of the electronic density along an adiabatic time evolution of the target molecule. The second issue is about the accurate computationability of the flux. The calculation of flux needs an accurate representation of the (relative) quantum phase, in addition to the amplitude factor, of a total wavefunction and demands special attention for practical calculations. This paper is the first one to approach this issue directly and show how the difficulties arise explicitly. In doing so, we reveal that a number of widely accepted truncation techniques for static property calculations are potential sources of numerical flux non-conservation. We also theoretically propose alternative strategies to realize better flux conservation.