Abstract
cast doubt on the findings of Divale and Harris' 1976 article were drawn from raw data made available to Hirschfeld upon his request. All the raw data used by Divale and Harris were made available. However, Hirschfeld et a!. chose to ignore the bulk of this information in order to concentrate on a small part of it, the part that deals with South American societies. On an ad hoc basis, Hirschfeld et a!. select parts of this small portion, criticize Divale and Harris' use of the familiar I test, and perform a series of complex statistical analyses employing a test widi which most social scientists are unfamiliar. Nowhere do they come to grips with the theory relating male supremacy
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
