Abstract

The article explores the following question: which among the most often examined in the literature method of constructing Hilbert-type axiom systems for finite-valued propositional logics of Łukasiewicz – the Rosser-Turquette method, the Tuziak method or the Grigolia system of axiom schemata – is in fact applicable in the researches on many-valued logics? Although the method offered by Rosser and Turquette is considered to be a solution of the problem of axiomatizability of finite-valued logics of Łukasiewicz, it has a serious limitation in producing adequate axiom systems. If the Rosser-Turquette axiom schemata are expressed just in terms of the standard propositional connectives which are definable in terms of the propositional connectives of Łukasiewicz’s logics, then every Rosser-Turquette axiom system for a Łukasiewicz’s logic is semantically incomplete. The article also examines the Tuziak axiom systems that actually axiomatize Łukasiewicz’s finite-valued logics and can be applied in the logical researches. The article compares the Tuziak axiom systems with the Grigolia set of axiom schemata, and it demonstrates that since a crucial in the Grigolia method definition of connectives is in fact invalid in Łukasiewicz’s logics, the Grigolia method does not provide sound axiom systems for Łukasiewicz’s logics.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call