Abstract
Any attempt to interpret Pushkin’s The Monument [ Pamyatnik ] has for a long time been frustrated by the struggle to explain what the poet meant by ‘the Alexandrian column’ ( Aleksandriyskiy stolp ), with which he contrasts the ‘the monument not built with hands’. The author proves that the researchers looking for the only correct answer (a pursuit that has kept Pushkin scholars busy for decades) have been asking the wrong question all along. It is his belief that the phrase ‘Alexandrian column’ is used in the poem without any identifiable denotation and that the image’s artistic vagueness is deliberate. The poem alludes to several historical objects from various countries and epochs, including the more contemporary rein of the Russian emperor Alexander I. However, it appears that none of those allusions have any distinguishable features for identification purposes, hence easy confusion of the Alexander column with the Lighthouse of Alexandria. A similar effect occurs from the use of the ambiguous adjective ‘Aleksandriyskiy’ (‘Alexandrian’) to describe the Alexander column, illustrating the eroding historical memory about rulers.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.