Abstract
New regulations promote the role of Central Counter-Parties (CCPs) as insurers of counterparty risk to stabilize derivative markets. Whereas the US favors monopolistic CCPs, the EU promotes the coexistence of several CCPs for a given asset class. In this paper, we shed light on the competition between CCPs. We start by reviewing their business model and gather public data to show how they differentiate on several dimensions: geographic, product line, and quality. We then study how pairs of dealers choose the CCP on which they clear a given transaction. For that, we use transaction data on three main CDS indices and focus on major dealers who are members of the two main CCPs clearing these indices. We find that differences in transaction size, two indicators of CCP's robustness quality, and market volatility affect this choice but not the collateral costs, proxied by the dealers' positions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.