Abstract

Abstract The squashing factor (or squashing degree) of a vector field is a quantitative measure of the deformation of the field line mapping between two surfaces. In the context of solar magnetic fields, it is often used to identify gradients in the mapping of elementary magnetic flux tubes between various flux domains. Regions where these gradients in the mapping are large are referred to as quasi-separatrix layers (QSLs), and are a continuous extension of separators and separatrix surfaces. These QSLs are observed to be potential sites for the formation of strong electric currents, and are therefore important for the study of magnetic reconnection in three dimensions. Since the squashing factor, Q, is defined in terms of the Jacobian of the field line mapping, it is most often calculated by first determining the mapping between two surfaces (or some approximation of it) and then numerically differentiating. Tassev & Savcheva have introduced an alternative method, in which they parameterize the change in separation between adjacent field lines, and then integrate along individual field lines to get an estimate of the Jacobian without the need to numerically differentiate the mapping itself. But while their method offers certain computational advantages, it is formulated on a perturbative description of the field line trajectory, and the accuracy of this method is not entirely clear. Here we show, through an alternative derivation, that this integral formulation is, in principle, exact. We then demonstrate the result in the case of a linear, 3D magnetic null, which allows for an exact analytical description and direct comparison to numerical estimates.

Highlights

  • Magnetic reconnection, which is thought to be the primary mechanism for the release of magnetic free energy in the solar corona, is a process by which magnetic field lines change their connectivity, in violation of the frozen-in condition

  • We demonstrate the result in the case of a linear, 3D magnetic null, which allows for an exact analytical description and direct comparison to numerical estimates

  • In twodimensional (2D) reconnection, this process is restricted to occur only at magnetic nulls, and so the study of magnetic reconnection has naturally been connected to magnetic topology, with topological features such as nulls, spines, and separatrix surfaces playing key roles

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Magnetic reconnection, which is thought to be the primary mechanism for the release of magnetic free energy in the solar corona, is a process by which magnetic field lines change their connectivity, in violation of the frozen-in condition. This method is relatively straightforward in principle; the quantitative result can vary significantly with only slight variations in its implementation, and it is not always clear whether the calculated value is representative of the underlying structure of the field, or some artifact of the implementation This is the case when calculating Q for an intermediate point along a field line, and it was this concern that led Pariat & Démoulin (2012) to perform a survey of different implementations of the technique, in which they reviewed the adverse effects that arise from various seemingly benign assumptions before offering a “best practices” method, therein called “method 3.”.

Transport Formulation
The Jacobian
Transport of Tangents
Rotation of the Tangent Plane
Summary and Application
Exact Solution
Numerical Estimate
Findings
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.