Abstract

In this paper, we examine the effects of the cross- correlation of stock returns on the long-run post merger stock performance of UK acquiring firms over the period 19852001. We show that, in general, the widely documented anomaly of long-run underperformance following mergers is not due to various stylised merger effects but rather due to the cross-correlation of stock return s, which compromises the ‘independence of observations’ assumption, thus yie lding overstated test statistics. We test, in particular, the method of payment, diversi fication, book-to-market, and size effects in mergers. We find that these documented l ong-run effects simply disappear after accounting for the cross-sectional dependence of sample returns. Our results highlight the importance of controlling for the cro ss-correlation of stock returns in long-run post merger event studies.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call