On the Line: Continuing Professional Development between Research and Practice

Abstract

Occupational therapists are increasingly working in research roles. Although a relatively small proportion of therapists are currently obtaining research qualifications (Bannigan and Duncan 2001), the profession has a history of inquiry as befits a concern with human activities and adaptation and the present concern with continuing professional development (CPD) (College of Occupational Therapists [COT] 2000, Department of Health [DH] 2001). With the current emphases on CPD and evidence-based practice across the National Health Service (NHS), it is to be hoped that occupational therapists and other allied health professionals will be able to obtain research posts to underpin these initiatives. Historically, it has been difficult to get funding and recognition for professional research needs, with a consequent dearth of supporting evidence for occupational therapy (Ilott and White 2001). The College of Occupational Therapists has clearly prioritised these issues, both in its research and development strategy and in its Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct (COT 2000). These concerns reflect NHS policy for the allied health professions (DH 2000a), particularly the requirements for evidence of CPD for continuing registration under the Health Professions Council (DH 2001) and the plans for the development of consultant therapists (DH 2000b).