Abstract
Many cutting problems on two- or three-dimensional objects require that the cuts be orthogonal and of guillotine type. However, there are applications in which the cuts must be orthogonal but need not be of guillotine type. In this paper we focus on the latter type of cuts on rectangular bins. We investigate the so-called \(L\)-approach, introduced by Lins et al. (J Oper Res Soc 54:777–789, 2003), which has been used to tackle, among others, the pallet loading problem and the two-dimensional unconstrained knapsack problem. This approach concerns a method to generate two \(L\)-shaped pieces from an \(L\)-shaped piece. More recently, Birgin et al. (J Oper Res Soc 63(2):183–200, 2012), raised two questions concerning this approach. The first question is whether one may restrict only to cuts on raster points (rather than on all discretization points), without loss in the quality of the solution. We prove that the answer to this question is positive. The second question is whether the \(L\)-approach is an optimal method to solve the unconstrained knapsack problem. We show an instance of the problem for which this approach fails to find an optimum solution.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.