Abstract
Despite all the evident benefits of miniaturized particulate matter (PM) sensors, an inherent drawback exists in the uncertainty and validity of the measurement, which is closely related to the discrete nature of particulates suspended in air. The miniaturization of these devices not only leads to a smaller footprint for the devices themselves but also to a smaller volume of air being sampled. Even if a perfect measurement system is assumed, an uncertainty lies in assigning a supposedly representative particle concentration value to an environment due to the inherent variability of PM concentrations on small scales. This stems from the fact that particles are stochastically distributed in the air, leading to a non-uniform concentration for arbitrarily small volumes. Consequently, an uncertainty exists according to counting statistics, as the number of investigated particles in a small air sample is also low. Depending on the metric, the uncertainty may be augmented, as a small number of particles cannot accurately capture the distribution of particle sizes, especially since the size distribution extends over several orders of magnitude. This distribution related uncertainty is relevant for surface and mass related metrics in addition to the uncertainty resulting from counting statistics. We detected a minor impact from the distribution of the particle mass density, which contributes to the uncertainty for mass-related metrics, such as PM1, PM2.5 and PM10. We investigated the expected measurement uncertainty by analytical means and concluded that the distribution of particle sizes, the sample size and the ambient particle concentration significantly affect the measurement uncertainty for the range of conditions considered. To the best of our knowledge, this uncertainty has not been discussed in the current literature.
Highlights
Serious adverse health effects of particulate matter (PM) on the human body (Ranft et al, 2009; Kioumourtzoglou et al, 2016) raise a public desire for highly integrated, cost-effective and easy-to-use PM sensors
We find three separate contributions to the total uncertainty: One stems from counting statistics, the second one is caused by the broad distribution of particle sizes in the ambient environment, which plays a role for metrics such as surface concentration and mass concentration, and a third contribution to the total measurement uncertainty comes from the distribution of particle mass densities
The model addresses the uncertainty in the particle number concentration and the surface concentration as well as the mass concentration for metrics such as PM1, PM2.5 and PM10
Summary
Serious adverse health effects of particulate matter (PM) on the human body (Ranft et al, 2009; Kioumourtzoglou et al, 2016) raise a public desire for highly integrated, cost-effective and easy-to-use PM sensors. The sample size of PM sensors is typically decreasing for a given integration time as they get smaller. As the sampled volume gets smaller, the number of particles analyzed and used to estimate ambient PM concentrations gets lower. The uncertainty of the estimated ambient particle concentration given the measurement of a sensor is equal to the inherent variability of PM on the scale of the sample volume. The smaller the sample gets, the higher the variability between measurements within the same ambient conditions will be. This uncertainty is dependent on the metric used, which can depend on the sensor effect in use
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.