Abstract
It has been asserted in the past that any Bayesian treatment of the model selection problem in regression using some form of continuous loss structure would always lead to using the largest possible model (Leamer 1979; Chow 1981). We show in this paper that, provided the distinction between the choice of a model and the estimation of its parameters is maintained, the Kullback-Leibler information measure can be used in a Bayesian context to derive a criterion which may lead to parsimony of parameters in regression analysis.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
