Abstract
In this article I propose to reconsider Hugh Townshend's contribution in terms of the assessment made by George Shackle that Townshend proved the indeterminacy and nihilism inherent in the General theory. What I shall show, however, is that Townshend did not conclude that asset prices were indeterminate, but rather that they fell within a range of determinacy depending upon the relative magnitude of certain conventional criteria. And whilst it is true that Keynes clearly felt that an econonmy would be unpredictably unstable when these conventions broke down his motivation was to focus on the conditions by which the instiutional and conventional generative mechanisms could explain the relative stability of an economy when the prospective yield of assets were uncertain.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
