Abstract
This paper examines a compound collective risk model in which the primary distribution comprised the Poisson–Lindley distribution with a λ parameter, and where the secondary distribution is an exponential one with a θ parameter. We consider the case of dependence between risk profiles (i.e., the parameters λ and θ), where the dependence is modelled by a Farlie–Gumbel–Morgenstern family. We analyze the consequences of the dependence on the Bayes premium. We conclude that the consequences of the dependence on the Bayes premium may vary considerably.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.