Abstract
We discuss extensions of time-dependent mean-field theories such as time-dependent local density approximation (TDLDA) in order to include incoherent dynamical correlations, which are known to play a key role in far-off equilibrium dynamics. We focus here on the case of irradiation dynamics in clusters and molecules. The field, still largely unexplored, requires quantum approaches which represents a major formal and computational effort. We present several approaches we have investigated to address such an issue. We start with time-dependent current-density functional theory (TDCDFT), known to provide damping in the linear regime and explore its capability far-off equilibrium. We observe difficulties with the scaling of relaxation times with deposited energy. We next briefly discuss semi-classical approaches which deliver kinetic equations applicable at sufficiently large excitation energies. We then consider a first quantum kinetic equation at the level of a simplified, though rather elaborate in its content, relaxation time approximation (RTA). Thanks to its sophistication, the method allows us to address numerous realistic irradiation scenarios beyond the usual domain of reliability of such theories. We demonstrate in particular the key role played by dense spectral regions in the impact of dissipation in the response of the irradiated system. RTA nevertheless remains a phenomenological approach which calls for more fundamental descriptions. This is achieved by a stochastic extension of mean field theory, coined stochastic time dependent Hartree–Fock (STDHF), which provides an ensemble description of far-off equilibrium dynamics. The method is equivalent to a quantum kinetic equation complemented by a stochastic collision term. STDHF clearly leads to proper thermalization behaviors in 1D test systems considered here. It remains limited by its ensemble nature which requires possibly huge ensembles to properly sample small transition rates. An alternative approach, coined average STDHF (ASTDHF), consists in overlooking mean field fluctuations of STDHF. ASTDHF provides a robust tool, properly matching STDHF when possible and allowing extension to realistic dynamical scenarios in full 3D. It can also be used in open systems to explore, as done in RTA, the competition between ionization and dissipation.
Highlights
The theoretical description of far-off equilibrium dynamics in quantum many-body systems remains since numerous decades a widely open and unresolved problem
As soon as ionic motion is accounted for, one should consider potential impact of ionic temperature on measurements. This effect is well known in cluster physics where temperature is a key ingredient in cluster production [135], and the impact of ionic temperature has been clearly observed in the optical response of metal clusters [136] and is suspected to be large in photo-electron spectra (PES) and photo-angular distributions (PAD), for example in C60 irradiation scenarios [37]
The system is excited at initial time by a 1ph transition chosen from the ground state s.p. spectrum, following again the strategy presented in [78,142], and which has proven efficient for validating stochastic time dependent Hartree–Fock (STDHF)
Summary
The theoretical description of far-off equilibrium dynamics in quantum many-body systems remains since numerous decades a widely open and unresolved problem. Among the many fields of applications, we focus here on the generic case of thermally isolated, finite many-electron systems (atoms, molecules, clusters) excited by high intensity lasers or swift ions, the developed theories should be applicable (with proper adaptation) to other scientific fields. In such laser irradiation scenarios, electrons immediately react to the external electro-magnetic field driving the system far-off equilibrium ( well beyond the Born–Oppenheimer approximation, in molecular terms) but still fully in the quantum regime, as clearly pointed out by recent experiments, which find clear quantum and thermal pattern in photo-electron spectra [30,31,32]. We shall mostly focus here on electronic degrees of freedom, except for Section 5.4 where we briefly comment on the impact of thermal ionic motion
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.