Abstract

Estimating variability across spatial scales has been a major issue in ecology because the description of patterns in space is extremely valuable to propose specific hypotheses to unveil key processes behind these patterns. This paper aims to estimate the variability of the coral assemblage structure at different spatial scales in order to determine which scales explain the largest variability on β-diversity. For this, a fully-nested design including a series of hierarchical-random factors encompassing three spatial scales: (1) regions, (2) localities and (3) reefs sites across the Venezuelan territory. The variability among spatial scales was tested with a permutation-based analysis of variance (Permanova) based on Bray-Curtis index. Dispersion in species presence/absence across scales (i.e., β-diversity) was tested with a PermDisp analysis based on Jaccard’s index. We found the highest variability in the coral assemblage structure between sites within localities (Pseudo-F = 5.34; p-value = 0.001, CV = 35.10%). We also found that longitude (Canonical corr = 0.867, p = 0.001) is a better predictor of the coral assemblage structure in Venezuela, than latitude (Canonical corr = 0.552, p = 0.021). Largest changes in β-diversity of corals occurred within sites (F = 2.764, df1= 35, df2 = 107, p = 0.045) and within localities (F = 4.438, df1= 6, df2 = 29, p = 0.026). Our results suggest that processes operating at spatial scales of hundreds of meters and hundreds of kilometers might both be critical to shape coral assemblage structure in Venezuela, whereas smaller scales (i.e., hundreds of meters) showed to be highly- important for the species turnover component of β-diversity. This result highlights the importance of creating scale-adapted management actions in Venezuela and likely across the Caribbean region.

Highlights

  • The importance of scales in ecology has been largely acknowledged for decades (Schneider, 2001; Mac Nally & Quinn, 1998; Wiens, 1989). MacArthur (1972) and Levin (1992) assaysHow to cite this article Miyazawa E, Montilla LM, Agudo-Adriani EA, Ascanio A, Mariño-Briceño G, Croquer A. 2020

  • Today it is known that ecological dynamics tend to be stochastic at small scales, but variability is conditional on the resolution of description (Chave, 2013; Levin, 1992)

  • The results show that species composition and abundance of corals in Venezuela varied across different spatial scales

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The importance of scales in ecology has been largely acknowledged for decades (Schneider, 2001; Mac Nally & Quinn, 1998; Wiens, 1989). MacArthur (1972) and Levin (1992) assaysHow to cite this article Miyazawa E, Montilla LM, Agudo-Adriani EA, Ascanio A, Mariño-Briceño G, Croquer A. 2020. Today it is known that ecological dynamics tend to be stochastic at small scales, but variability is conditional on the resolution of description (Chave, 2013; Levin, 1992). Modern ecological thinking agrees that in order to understand a system (e.g., a community), it is important to study it at the appropriate scale (Chave, 2013)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.